![]() In other words, the same setting appearing twice in the same response will not cause a second database call.īut 11 database queries is still WAY more than "should" be used (an optimized version of this API call would only require 3 database queries). It produces the same JSON result, but improves performance slightly by appearing to cache the queries internal to the call. Download install app store on pc for free (Windows) Windows Users choice Install app store on pc Install app store on pc Most people looking for Install app store on pc downloaded: Microsoft Store Download Manager Download 3. I do see that it actually improves the query count.įor example, if I use this query: MachineProfile also displays internal battery information for Mac notebook computers. MachineProfile includes a Drive Info tab, providing technical information about the drives connected to your Mac. I'm wondering if it's worth porting this code to EF Core, or if there's an existing solution.Įdit1 I tried using the GraphQL package because I plan on building my server as GraphQL anyways. MachineProfile displays your Mac's technical profile information within a single window. This is similar to how works, except that it defers and batches the queries to solve the N+1 problem. There exist GraphQL solutions to this problem, which inject thread blocks into the query tree traversal. This is a classic example of an horribly-optimized N+1 query.ĭoes there exist any package or well-known solution to avoid this?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |